Tag: <span>film</span>

film
Toronto, 2003          © Avard Woolaver

Film Used to Cost a Lot (Day 6 of 31)

Are you a digital native with photography, or do you remember film? I was a film diehard for a long time, making the switch only around 2006. Film was getting harder to buy, harder to have developed, and just generally more of a hassle. I was pretty sure I’d dislike shooting digital, though, so I’d held out for a long time.

Well, this was another lesson learned about the fallacy of predictions. I loved my digital camera. The difference in the tones of the print, which I was sure would bother me, didn’t seem like an issue. There were slight differences, but they were minimal.

And the cost per shot! These things were basically free! Sure, printing was still an expense, but you could take photos and view them for nothing. I felt I’d been set loose on the world with unlimited resources. The first eight months I had my first digital camera, I took 10,000 photos—around 40 per day. A few years later, I was up to 100 per day, or more.

But in the past year or two something has changed for me. I’m not tired of taking pictures; far from it. But I remember how much more thoughtful I had to be when every single shot represented an expense that was coming out of my wallet. (For those of you who don’t remember the days of film, it used to cost around $4 a roll, with developing and contact sheets or proofs on top of that.) Paying for it had kept me careful. Back in the 1980s, I always had to weigh my priorities, use my judgement, consider the shot before I pressed the shutter.

Do I think the extravagance of the past few years has been somehow bad for me? Like a moral failing, a photographic gluttony? No. I feel that I sharpened a lot of my skills during these years of easy photos, of taking hundreds of photos a day. It’s been great for me. I just find that I’ve moved into a different phase.

These things come upon us without our planning them. An interest or compulsion ebbs, or something inside you shifts. I’m reaching a point where what feels right for me now is to take fewer photos, more judiciously. It’s quite possible I might even return to shooting film.

Don’t you love the ways we surprise ourselves? You can think you know yourself so well, and then you learn something new.

(For the month of October 2017, I’m participating in the 31 Days bloggers’ challenge. You can find out about it here, and check out the interesting work other bloggers are posting.)

Blogging Photography

marching band, Toronto, shutter, 1983,
Marching Band, Toronto; 1983                                   © Avard Woolaver

National Geographic photographer Sam Abell once said, “My best work is often almost unconscious and occurs ahead of my ability to understand it.” It’s common to feel this way when editing and evaluating photos. Sometimes I don’t edit a group of photos until months or years after I’ve taken them, and I may catch nuances or connections then that escaped me when I took them.

That is why it is important not to worry so much about getting the perfect picture—just concentrate on capturing moments and experiences. You’ll have plenty of time later to reflect on it.

And, paradoxically, so much of photography is what happens after the moment. A photo takes one one-hundredth of a second, but we have lots of time afterwards to study and make sense of the image. Some photographers used to keep unprocessed film for months or years so that they could view it later with fresh eyes and a new perspective.

Photo tip:  Go over past work from time to time. There may be some worthwhile images that you passed over at the time. Time and experience can give new perspectives.

“Marching Band, Toronto; 1983” was discovered recently on a contact sheet some thirty four years after it was taken. It is from the series: Toronto Days

Colour Documentary Film Photography Photography Social Landscape

cat, humour, animals, sign, guard dogs,
Eastern Avenue, Toronto; 1983    © Avard Woolaver

 

Animals are unpredictable creatures. With anything unpredictable (motion; changing light) you’ll want to keep timing in the front of your mind while photographing.

Animals, both willing and unwilling, have been the subject of photographs since the earliest daguerreotype in 1839. Capturing an image of an animal was a tricky business back then, when  exposure times of 10 to 60 seconds were needed. These days digital cameras and smart phones make the process much easier, but getting a good photo is still tricky.

W.C. Fields famously said, “Never work with animals or children.” Photographer Elliott Erwitt, on the other hand, said, “I like working with children and animals. They are more obedient than most grownups. . . and they don’t ask for prints.” Erwitt has a unique way of getting humourous and idiosyncratic photos of dogs, yet manages to show our human connection with them. Many of his dog photos show people interacting with animals, and timing seems to be the critical component.

Photo tip: Try observing  an animal for some time before taking a photo; often the interaction with people makes a great moment. Stay ready to press the button.

 

Colour Documentary Film Photography Observation Photography Social Landscape